By: guest
I wonder if Scalia (Catholic) and Ginsburg (Jewish) discussed Scalia’s stupendously ignorant exchange with counsel (Peter Eliasberg) during oral argument in Salazar v. Buono, which dealt with the...
View ArticleBy: guest
and so I say now: Hang on Ruthie, Ruthie hang on Hang on Ruthie, Ruthie hang on
View ArticleBy: guest
Yes, 22, no doubt they discussed that oral argument exchange, because really, what else would one discuss at the opera? In the streets they talk of little else. Ginsburg and Scalia have been good...
View ArticleBy: guest
25, You may want to re-read the exchange. It was not about the scope of the Establishment Clause. It was about Scalia arguing that the cross is the most common resting place of “the dead.” Not the...
View ArticleBy: guest
26. Justice Scalia is undoubtedly vastly more intelligent than you are. While I agree that he should have thought twice before making the comment you have fixated on, one poorly considered comment does...
View ArticleBy: guest
22/26, Read and understood, but your distinction is completely beside the point. Justice Ginsburg apparently does not believe Justice Scalia to be an ignoramus, copulating or otherwise, and in fact...
View ArticleBy: guest
I had the opportunity to hear Scalia speak once, and can say that he was not exactly charming. He used his microphone to talk over a kid who was asking a serious question. Classy.
View ArticleBy: guest
27, Yes, he is undoubtedly more intelligent than I am. But it is not unreasonable to expect that the nine most (supposedly) learned legal minds in the country would understand that the Christian cross...
View ArticleBy: guest
http://www.gmsplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/normandy-cemetery.jpg http://mazh.com/pics/FR-Normandy-Colleville%20Cem.jpg http://mazh.com/pics/FR-Normandy-Omaha%20Beach%20Cem.jpg
View ArticleBy: guest
i still cannot believe there are people who are so self-absorbed that they are offended by PE’s posts….
View Article
